A systematic framework and implementation phase design for approaching Industry 4.0 from lean

Sharmin Akter Urmee & Md. Mosharraf Hossain

International Journal of Lean Six Sigma2026https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlss-07-2025-0210article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Purpose Integration of lean manufacturing and Industry 4.0 (I4) has been a discussable topic for some years now. Integration of these two can have a synergetic effect on the system. Previous research presented conceptual frameworks for integrating lean into I4 but lacked a systematic framework. This study aims to focus on proposing a systematic framework to approach I4 from lean manufacturing. Design/methodology/approach Assembly line data collected from an industry was used to create seven simulation models using ARENA software. Two lean tools – root cause analysis and assembly line balancing have been used to identify the source of defects and unevenness in the production line, with and without automation and I4. Findings The quantified study proves the validity of the systematic framework. This framework can be applied in all industries that are thinking of implementing I4. Originality/value Previous research presented conceptual frameworks for integrating lean into I4 but lacked a systematic framework. This study focuses on proposing a systematic framework to approach I4 from lean manufacturing.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlss-07-2025-0210

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{sharmin2026,
  title        = {{A systematic framework and implementation phase design for approaching Industry 4.0 from lean}},
  author       = {Sharmin Akter Urmee & Md. Mosharraf Hossain},
  journal      = {International Journal of Lean Six Sigma},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlss-07-2025-0210},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

A systematic framework and implementation phase design for approaching Industry 4.0 from lean

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.