Corrigendum: A safe work environment and a successful aging-in-place. Observations and floorplan analyses in residential care provision

Unknown author

Facilities2026https://doi.org/10.1108/f-02-2026-0022article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

It has come to the attention of the publisher that the article Andersson M., Granath K., Nilsson, M., Wijk, H. and Pettersson, C. (2025), “A safe work environment and a successful aging-in-place. Observations and floorplan analyses in residential care provision”. Facilities, Vol. 43 Nos 15-16 pp. 32-45, Link to the cited article. featured placeholder text which was inadvertently left in-text. Specifically, the placeholder text “Blinded for Review” was left in place of in-text citations and four references were omitted from the reference list.The impacted references have been listed below:In this context, staff who provide everyday care and services and medical staff are included (Andersson et al., 2005; Pettersson et al., 2019).The study protocol has been published separately (Pettersson et al., 2019).In a recent study, Andersson et al. (2021), develop the three concepts of bedroom capacity, spatial proximity and functional autonomy…studies have also focused on the residential working environment (Beer et al., 2014; Lindberg, et al., 2022; Pettersson et al., 2018; Pettersson et al., 2019; Pettersson et al., 2021).The study protocol has been published separately (Pettersson et al., 2019) and..…the three spatial qualities of bedroom capacity, spatial proximity and functional autonomy (Andersson et al., 2005)…The data collection was conducted during 2016–2017 (for a detailed description, see Pettersson et al., 2021).See the study protocol presented in Petersson et al., 2019.Based on the model developed by Andersson et al. (2021),This result is comparable to the results presented by Andersson et al. (2021).Concerning bedroom capacity, we identify some measures to have as reference values for new housing production (Andersson et al., 2021).However, results with focus group interviews of these categories are published previously (Pettersson et al., 2021).One example of the construction of a tool, or method, is the aforementioned paper by Andersson et al. (2021).Omitted references:Andersson, M., Granath, K. and Nylander, O. (2021), “Aging-in-Place: residents' Attitudes and Floor Plan Potential in Apartment Buildings From 1990 to 2015”, HERD, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 211-226, Link to the cited article..Pettersson, C., Slaug, B., Granbom, M., Kylberg, M. and Iwarsson, S. (2018), “Housing accessibility for senior citizens in Sweden: estimation of the effects of targeted elimination of environmental barriers”, Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 25 No. 6, pp. 407-418.Pettersson, C., Malmqvist, I., Gromark, S. and Wijk, H. (2019), “Study Protocol: the Physical Environment and Home Healthcare Services: The development and Content of a Study Protocol to Explore Enablers and Barriers for the delivery of Home Healthcare Services”, Nordic Journal of Architectural Research, Vol. 31 No. 2, pp. 105-122.Pettersson, C., Nilsson, M., Andersson, M. and Wijk, H. (2021), “The impact of the physical environment for caregiving in ordinary housing: experiences of staff in home- and health-care services”, Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 92, No. 3, Link to the cited article..The publisher asks that the above are confirmed at article proofing stage.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/f-02-2026-0022

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{unknown2026,
  title        = {{Corrigendum: A safe work environment and a successful aging-in-place. Observations and floorplan analyses in residential care provision}},
  author       = {Unknown author},
  journal      = {Facilities},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/f-02-2026-0022},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Corrigendum: A safe work environment and a successful aging-in-place. Observations and floorplan analyses in residential care provision

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.