Lut Desert Mars Hike Tour as an Idea for Destination Dupe

Amir Ghorbani & Ali Zangiabadi

Journal of Travel Research2026https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875261424439article
AJG 4ABDC A*
Weight
0.50

Abstract

In this study, it was attempted to answer the question: “ How does the concept of destination dupe expand or complicate current theories of destination substitutability?” using a case study approach. To this end, a professional research team traveled more than 700 km into the depths of the Lut Desert over a 5-year period, based on recorded GPS tracks. The team was accompanied by native guides and researchers as part of the “Lut Desert Mars Hike Tour Package,” in order to visit terrestrial analogs of Martian phenomena in the Lut Desert. The recently coined term “destination dupe,” as an extension of the concept of destination substitutability, refers to the tourists’ conscious fantasy, irrespective of the limitations associated with destination substitutability, where an example of the destination does not exist in the real world or lack a terrestrial equivalent. This gap has been addressed in the literature by focusing on distinctions between destination substitutability and destination dupe as extensively as possible.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875261424439

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{amir2026,
  title        = {{Lut Desert Mars Hike Tour as an Idea for Destination Dupe}},
  author       = {Amir Ghorbani & Ali Zangiabadi},
  journal      = {Journal of Travel Research},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875261424439},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Lut Desert Mars Hike Tour as an Idea for Destination Dupe

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.