arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Corrigendum: Board of directors characteristics and firm performance: the role of intellectual capital

Unknown author

Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences2026https://doi.org/10.1108/jeas-12-2025-0891article
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

It has come to the attention of the publisher that in the article by Wijaya H, Gumanti TA (2025), “Board of directors characteristics and firm performance: the role of intellectual capital,” Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEAS-06-2025-0340, the formatting of Tables 6, 7, and 8 was incorrect in the published version.Specifically, the t-statistics and significance asterisks were not placed in their correct positions. The t-statistics should appear on the second line below each coefficient, followed by the appropriate significance asterisks.The tables should read as:The publisher asks that format be entered correctly at submission and confirmed at the article proofing stage.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jeas-12-2025-0891

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{unknown2026,
  title        = {{Corrigendum: Board of directors characteristics and firm performance: the role of intellectual capital}},
  author       = {Unknown author},
  journal      = {Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jeas-12-2025-0891},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Corrigendum: Board of directors characteristics and firm performance: the role of intellectual capital

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.