arbiter
JournalsAccount

The War Against Venereal Diseases: Engineering Protective Practices During World War II in Sweden

Anna Inez Bergman

Enterprise and Society2026https://doi.org/10.1017/eso.2025.10111article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.37

Abstract

During World War II, condom consumption increased in both belligerent and non-belligerent countries, including Sweden. Yet the relationship between state-led initiatives and commercial marketing in driving this trend has received little scholarly attention. The main sources in this article consist of wartime public health campaigns and condom advertisements. Applying the concepts of social and consumer engineering, the article examines how government interventions, specifically through public health measures, influenced condom marketing practices. The findings show that wartime campaigns sought to engineer citizens’ sexual behavior and that businesses strategically aligned their messaging with government propaganda. This convergence was instrumental in positioning condoms as essential tools for public health and facilitated a more permissive attitude toward condoms as prophylactics, bridging state-led public health efforts with commercial objectives. By examining this dynamic, the article contributes to understanding how wartime policies shaped consumer behavior and forged enduring connections between public health and market strategies.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/eso.2025.10111

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{anna2026,
  title        = {{The War Against Venereal Diseases: Engineering Protective Practices During World War II in Sweden}},
  author       = {Anna Inez Bergman},
  journal      = {Enterprise and Society},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/eso.2025.10111},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The War Against Venereal Diseases: Engineering Protective Practices During World War II in Sweden

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.