Intersecting demands: work-life balance and role theory among women school principals in rural settings

Margaret Hudson & Barbara J. Hickman

Journal of Educational Administration2026https://doi.org/10.1108/jea-01-2025-0007article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.37

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this research is to examine the work-life balance (WLB) experiences of women principals in rural settings through the lens of role theory. Design/methodology/approach Using a qualitative cross-sectional survey design, the study combines deductive role theory analysis and inductive thematic analysis. Findings The findings reveal how perceptions of WLB intersect with gender, rural context, and role theory concepts (role overload, role conflict and role strain). Additional themes emerging from the data validate and extend traditional role theory understanding. Originality/value This study contributes to role theory application in rural educational settings by introducing work-life fluidity as a theoretical extension, identifying political/systems issues that amplify role challenges and exposing an implementation gap between knowing and applying WLB strategies. These insights inform policies and practices for sustainable women's leadership.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jea-01-2025-0007

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{margaret2026,
  title        = {{Intersecting demands: work-life balance and role theory among women school principals in rural settings}},
  author       = {Margaret Hudson & Barbara J. Hickman},
  journal      = {Journal of Educational Administration},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/jea-01-2025-0007},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Intersecting demands: work-life balance and role theory among women school principals in rural settings

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.