Business and Society, the Society and Business, and, What Is It Like to Be a Rat?

Christopher Michaelson

Business Ethics Quarterly2025https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2024.28article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.41

Abstract

This essay reconsiders the possibility and prospects for the relationship between business ethics scholarship and the world of business practice. More specifically, to a field that often considers the question, “What should be the role of business in society?” it poses the question, “What should be the role of the Society for Business Ethics in business?” My intent is not to solve the related epistemological question of whether we have to “be one to know one.” It is, however, to encourage scholars to leave our laboratories more often to engage with the work and world of those we study. To that end, the essay poses a series of questions for us – individual scholars, members of the Society, and the Society itself – to consider about our relationship with business. It concludes with a postscript response to one of those questions: When, if ever, should the Society make public statements?

2 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2024.28

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{christopher2025,
  title        = {{Business and Society, the Society and Business, and, What Is It Like to Be a Rat?}},
  author       = {Christopher Michaelson},
  journal      = {Business Ethics Quarterly},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2024.28},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Business and Society, the Society and Business, and, What Is It Like to Be a Rat?

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.