Competing through copycats or private labels?: Entry strategies for small manufacturers

Yujing Chen et al.

International Transactions in Operational Research2026https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.70174article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This paper explores the strategic decisions faced by a small manufacturer entering a market dominated by a larger manufacturer. Due to the lack of technical superiority, the small manufacturer needs to choose between producing copycats or private labels. To address this, we propose a two‐period game theoretical model that encapsulates the strategic interactions between a dominant manufacturer of genuine products and a smaller manufacturer producing either copycats or private labels, considering both strategic and myopic consumers. Our research indicates that consumers' purchasing decisions are influenced not only by price, but also by product quality, brand value, and consumer patience. Our equilibrium analysis suggests that, as the production cost of genuine products increases, the small manufacturer will sequentially adopt a passive production strategy for copycats, an active acceptance strategy to produce private labels, and an active rejection strategy to produce copycats. We also study Pareto‐improving contracts where the dominant manufacturer lowers the wholesale price to incentivize collaboration with the small manufacturer in producing private labels, leading to a mutually beneficial outcome. To complement our theoretical findings, we include numerical studies that further elaborate on our results.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.70174

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{yujing2026,
  title        = {{Competing through copycats or private labels?: Entry strategies for small manufacturers}},
  author       = {Yujing Chen et al.},
  journal      = {International Transactions in Operational Research},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.70174},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Competing through copycats or private labels?: Entry strategies for small manufacturers

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.