Dataveillance Duality: Navigating Employee Accountability and Privacy Concerns in the Digital Age

Paul A. Raddatz et al.

Journal of Information Systems2025https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-2023-050article
AJG 1ABDC A
Weight
0.37

Abstract

This study examines the impact of dataveillance on employee accountability, privacy invasion, and compliance intentions across various industries. By drawing on accountability theory and analyzing survey data from 149 employees, we explore how monitoring practices influence these perceptions. Our findings reveal that dataveillance significantly enhances accountability, which in turn promotes compliance with data security policies. However, heightened perceptions of privacy invasion due to monitoring can reduce compliance intentions, creating a tension between its positive and negative effects. These results emphasize the dual role of workplace monitoring, as it serves both to reinforce accountability and to provoke concerns about privacy. Organizations must navigate these tradeoffs carefully to maximize the benefits of dataveillance while minimizing its adverse impacts on employee behavior. This study contributes to the literature by demonstrating how dataveillance simultaneously enhances accountability and heightens privacy concerns, providing insights into the tradeoffs organizations face when implementing monitoring practices to ensure compliance.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-2023-050

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{paul2025,
  title        = {{Dataveillance Duality: Navigating Employee Accountability and Privacy Concerns in the Digital Age}},
  author       = {Paul A. Raddatz et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Information Systems},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-2023-050},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Dataveillance Duality: Navigating Employee Accountability and Privacy Concerns in the Digital Age

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.