arbiter
JournalsAccount

IPO audit contingent fees and earnings reversal

Yu Du et al.

China Journal of Accounting Research2026https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2025.100465article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

This study investigates how contingent fees in initial public offering (IPO) audits affect earnings reversals. Using a sample of Chinese firms with IPOs, we find that higher contingent fees are associated with a greater likelihood of post-IPO performance deterioration and worse firm outcomes. This effect is more pronounced among non-state-owned (vs. state-owned) firms and those facing weaker regulatory oversight, lower information quality and higher economic policy uncertainty. Further analysis shows that contingent fees significantly accelerate the IPO process, and that firms are likely to retain the same accounting firm that conducted their IPO audit after going public. We also observe that firms paying higher contingent fees experience worse long-term market performance following their listing. Overall, our results indicate that contingent fees in IPO audits undermine the independence of audits. This study not only contributes to the academic literature on contingent fees in the IPO context but also offers empirical support for regulatory efforts to enhance IPO audit pricing oversight.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2025.100465

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{yu2026,
  title        = {{IPO audit contingent fees and earnings reversal}},
  author       = {Yu Du et al.},
  journal      = {China Journal of Accounting Research},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2025.100465},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

IPO audit contingent fees and earnings reversal

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.