arbiter
JournalsAccount

Legal Considerations in Machine-Assisted Decision-Making: Planning and Building as a Case Study

Yee‐Fui Ng et al.

Bond Law Review2023https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.87776article
ABDC B
Weight
0.75

Abstract

The rise of automated decision-making in government poses both benefits and challenges. This article identifies and examines legal considerations relevant to governments and businesses in automating existing decision-making processes, focussing on planning permits and building approvals as a case study. It examines issues of transparency, algorithmic bias, privacy, data and intellectual property rights, as well as the implications of the use of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI). It also considers legal issues including whether decisions can be automated and if so, whether they are susceptible to judicial and administrative review; legal liability for damage caused by the use of AI in government decision-making; and the admissibility of AI-generated information. It is argued that although the use of AI provides significant benefits in terms of speed, efficiency and quality of decision-making, attention to the considerations of transparency, responsibility, privacy, liability and admissibility is required to minimise the risks of utilising AI systems.

7 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.87776

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{yee‐fui2023,
  title        = {{Legal Considerations in Machine-Assisted Decision-Making: Planning and Building as a Case Study}},
  author       = {Yee‐Fui Ng et al.},
  journal      = {Bond Law Review},
  year         = {2023},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.87776},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Legal Considerations in Machine-Assisted Decision-Making: Planning and Building as a Case Study

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.75

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact1.00 × 0.4 = 0.40
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.