Bargaining for the Common Good in Bankruptcy

Alvin Velazquez

Labor Studies Journal2025https://doi.org/10.1177/0160449x251324433article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

When a corporation files for bankruptcy, it is usually bad news for workers. That is because most corporations are usually looking to slash wages or seek other concessions from workers. Unions that fight back risk having the bankrupt corporation seek judicial approval to set aside their collective bargaining agreement. The news is not much better for public sector workers when a government goes into bankruptcy because the law forces governments to prioritize debt payments to financial creditors over workers. Certain funds, often called “vulture funds,” opportunistically purchased distressed governmental debt such as Puerto Rico's cheaply and then used the bankruptcy process to extract profits. What happened in Puerto Rico's bankruptcy challenged that convention. This article explains how unions learned from previous engagements to engage their membership, organize with public allies, and use the bankruptcy code to bargain for the common good to prevent pension cuts and protect their collective bargaining agreements.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0160449x251324433

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{alvin2025,
  title        = {{Bargaining for the Common Good in Bankruptcy}},
  author       = {Alvin Velazquez},
  journal      = {Labor Studies Journal},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0160449x251324433},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Bargaining for the Common Good in Bankruptcy

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.