Regenerating the Peatland Forests of Kalimantan Through Dayak Ngaju Language: New Animisms, Ecolinguistics and the Naming of Worlds

Corry Antang et al.

Australian Journal of Environmental Education2026https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2025.10108article
ABDC B
Weight
0.41

Abstract

For many First Peoples, language is indissociable from living relationships within interspecies communities where humans are not the only ones who feel, think, listen and speak. Words not only carry meanings attributable to human language but also carry the spirit of a place, as both a material and metaphysical transmission of sentience across species and generations. This article draws on ecolinguistic research into the Indigenous language of the Dayak Ngaju people and its role in regenerating peatland forests in Central Kalimantan. The study employs an Indigenous research methodology led by the first author, who is a PhD student and member of the Dayak Ngaju community. This methodology situates Dayak Ngaju language within an animistic reality inclusive of nonhuman creatures, objects and spiritual beings. Attending to the complexities of Indigenous PhD studies, the article proposes the cultivation of “new animisms,” which recognise the future-making pedagogies of Indigenous ontologies and ecolinguistic systems.

2 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2025.10108

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{corry2026,
  title        = {{Regenerating the Peatland Forests of Kalimantan Through Dayak Ngaju Language: New Animisms, Ecolinguistics and the Naming of Worlds}},
  author       = {Corry Antang et al.},
  journal      = {Australian Journal of Environmental Education},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2025.10108},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Regenerating the Peatland Forests of Kalimantan Through Dayak Ngaju Language: New Animisms, Ecolinguistics and the Naming of Worlds

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.