Is My Research A Responsible?

Dennis Tourish & Russell Craig

Academy of Management Learning and Education2025https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2024.0473article
AJG 4*ABDC A*
Weight
0.46

Abstract

Responsibility in research is usually viewed as consisting of two mutually exclusive categories: responsible research and irresponsible research. Our essay introduces a third category, aresponsible research. This reimagines responsibility in research as a continuum, with responsible research at one end, irresponsible research at the other end, and with aresponsible research overlapping both in the middle. Aresponsible research makes no real difference to anyone but clogs the pages of journals with work that matters little. It seems exemplary because it appears to follow accepted research protocols, thus imitating the norms of responsible research. However, its primary purposes are to advance the careers of the researchers involved and to improve the position of their universities in league tables. Such intentions have much in common with irresponsible research. The concept of aresponsible research will help the research community to fashion research-related policy, protocols, and mindsets that prioritize research as the pursuit of truth by increasing what is known and reducing what is not known, particularly about issues that really matter. Making a difference in this way also requires a greater emphasis on critical thinking. We offer eight recommendations to increase the incidence of responsible research and encourage meaningful engagement with pressing societal issues.

4 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2024.0473

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{dennis2025,
  title        = {{Is My Research A Responsible?}},
  author       = {Dennis Tourish & Russell Craig},
  journal      = {Academy of Management Learning and Education},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2024.0473},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Is My Research A Responsible?

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.46

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.37 × 0.4 = 0.15
M · momentum0.60 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.