arbiter
JournalsAccount

The Accounting Treatment of Unaccounted Intangibles: Exploring the Trade Offs of Preparers, Users and Professionals

Stefano Zambon et al.

Accounting in Europe2025https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2025.2576054article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

The reporting of unaccounted intangibles remains a complex and unresolved issue in financial accounting. Recent regulatory developments, including possible revisions to IAS 38 and new sustainability reporting requirements, have renewed interest in how such resources should be measured, reported and disclosed. Through a survey-based analysis this study firstly explores the contingency factors that affect the views of preparers, users, and professionals on the treatment of unaccounted intangibles as well as their costs-benefits considerations. Results show that professional role significantly shapes preferences. From a tradeoffs perspective, preparers generally adopt more conservative positions, consultants and auditors call for reform and users tend to rely on resources other than the financial statements. By examining all key stakeholder groups jointly, the study highlights important considerations for different regimes for accounting on intangibles. These findings offer timely and practical insights for standard setters aiming to improve the relevance of financial reporting.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2025.2576054

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{stefano2025,
  title        = {{The Accounting Treatment of Unaccounted Intangibles: Exploring the Trade Offs of Preparers, Users and Professionals}},
  author       = {Stefano Zambon et al.},
  journal      = {Accounting in Europe},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2025.2576054},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Accounting Treatment of Unaccounted Intangibles: Exploring the Trade Offs of Preparers, Users and Professionals

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.