Health inequality and health types

Margherita Borella et al.

Econometrics Journal2025https://doi.org/10.1093/ectj/utaf015article
AJG 3ABDC A*
Weight
0.37

Abstract

Summary Although health affects many economic outcomes, its dynamics are still poorly understood. We use k-means clustering, a machine learning technique, and data from the Health and Retirement Study to identify health types during middle and old age. We identify five health types: the vigorous resilient, the fair-health resilient, the fair-health vulnerable, the frail resilient, and the frail vulnerable. They are characterized by different starting health and health and mortality trajectories. Our five health types account for 84% of the variation in health trajectories and are not explained by observable characteristics, such as age, marital status, education, gender, race, health-related behaviours, and health insurance status, but rather by one’s past health dynamics. We also show that health types are important drivers of health and mortality heterogeneity and dynamics. Our results underscore the importance of better understanding health type formation and of modelling it appropriately to properly evaluate the effects of health on people’s decisions and the implications of policy reforms.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ectj/utaf015

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{margherita2025,
  title        = {{Health inequality and health types}},
  author       = {Margherita Borella et al.},
  journal      = {Econometrics Journal},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ectj/utaf015},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Health inequality and health types

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.