Cultural Entrepreneurship as Affective Networks: A Multi-sited Ethnography of Food Markets

Xênia L’amour Campos Oliveira & Eduardo Davel

Journal of Contemporary Administration2025https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2025240093.enarticle
AJG 1
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

Objective: to explain how affective networks support cultural entrepreneurship. Theoretical approach: theories of cultural entrepreneurship and affective networks, pointing out the relevance of networks and affectivity in this context. Method: a multi-sited ethnography was conducted in popular food markets, using ethnographic interviews, participant observation, documents, and visual and audiovisual records. Result: explaining cultural innovation, how affective networks support that process, and how the networks’ affectivity inspires the singularities of cultural entrepreneurship. Conclusions: the results contribute to advancing research on (a) cultural entrepreneurship as affective networks, (b) affectivity in entrepreneurship, and (c) cultural entrepreneurship as affective networks.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2025240093.en

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{xênia2025,
  title        = {{Cultural Entrepreneurship as Affective Networks: A Multi-sited Ethnography of Food Markets}},
  author       = {Xênia L’amour Campos Oliveira & Eduardo Davel},
  journal      = {Journal of Contemporary Administration},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2025240093.en},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Cultural Entrepreneurship as Affective Networks: A Multi-sited Ethnography of Food Markets

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.