Ensemble Transitive Bidirectional Decoupled Self-Distillation for Time-Series Classification
Zhiwen Xiao et al.
What the paper says
Numerous existing deep learning models for time-series classification (TSC) tend to overlook the intricate interplay between higher-and lower-level semantic information. While the focus is often on extracting higher-level semantics from lower-level sources, the reciprocal influence of lower-level information on higher levels is undervalued. To address this, we propose an ensemble transitive bidirectional decoupled self-distillation (ETBiDecSD) method for TSC. ETBiDecSD enhances the robustness of higher-level semantic information using an average feature ensemble (AFE) method to amalgamate the output from each level. Simultaneously, the integrated features are transmitted to each lower level through a directional decoupled distillation (DD) structure. Additionally, to promote deep interaction between higher-and lower-level semantic information, ETBiDecSD introduces a transitive bidirectional DD (TBDD) structure, facilitating the transfer of target-class and nontarget-class knowledge between higher and lower levels. Experimental results demonstrate that whether a fully convolutional network (FCN) with four convolutional blocks or InceptionTime with four Inception blocks is used as the baseline, ETBiDecSD outperforms a quantity of well-established self-distillation algorithms across 85 widely used UCR2018 datasets, as evidenced by the metrics “win”/“tie”/“lose” and avg. rank, which are derived from accuracy and F1-scores. Notably, when compared to a nonself-distillation FCN, ETBiDecSD achieves “win”/“tie”/“lose” results of 64/4/17 in terms of accuracy and 65/4/16 in terms of F1-score. Similarly, in comparison to a nonself-distillation InceptionTime, ETBiDecSD attains “win”/“tie”/“lose” results of 60/12/13 for accuracy and 57/12/16 for F1-score.
3 citations
Evidence weight
Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
| F · citation impact | 0.32 × 0.4 = 0.13 |
| M · momentum | 0.57 × 0.15 = 0.09 |
| V · venue signal | 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 |
| R · text relevance † | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.