Domestic and international approaches to combating ransomware: between contradiction and coherence

Tsvetelina J van Benthem & Roxana Radu

International Journal of Law and Information Technology2026https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaag004article
ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Ransomware is one of the greatest threats facing contemporary societies. Its harms are widespread and diverse, impacting physical assets, physical and psychological well-being, as well as trust in domestic and international institutions. To counter the ransomware threat, states have adopted a range of measures—from resilience-building at home to extraterritorial enforcement. These measures do not only have domestic implications. They have various touchpoints with international law. In some cases, especially in relation to extraterritorial law enforcement, they may come into tension with international obligations protecting state sovereignty. In others, states may be required by law to take positive measures to protect the rights of individuals and other states. States must take care in crafting domestic responses, as such responses must not conflict with obligations undertaken under international law. This paper explores the interaction between these domestic measures and relevant international obligations, with concrete examples from domestic practice and state signalling at the inter-governmental level.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaag004

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{tsvetelina2026,
  title        = {{Domestic and international approaches to combating ransomware: between contradiction and coherence}},
  author       = {Tsvetelina J van Benthem & Roxana Radu},
  journal      = {International Journal of Law and Information Technology},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaag004},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Domestic and international approaches to combating ransomware: between contradiction and coherence

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.