Qualitative Disclosure as a Tax Enforcement Mechanism: Evidence from the U.K. Tax Strategy Disclosure Requirement

Junwei Xia

Journal of the American Taxation Association2025https://doi.org/10.2308/jata-2023-041article
AJG 3ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

In 2016, the U.K. passed a regulation that requires large businesses to publicly disclose their tax strategy. The U.K. regulator expects these qualitative disclosures to attract public scrutiny of firms’ tax practices, thereby pressuring firms to reduce tax avoidance. This study examines whether the U.K. tax strategy disclosure requirement has achieved this objective. Using a difference-in-differences design and a sample of U.K. publicly traded firms, I find evidence that is most compatible with the regulation not having a significant impact on firms’ tax avoidance. Inferences are similar when I focus on subsamples that are most likely to exhibit the intended behavioral changes using a series of cross-sectional tests within treated firms. Thus, the collective evidence is largely inconsistent with the regulation successfully curbing tax avoidance, which should inform regulators worldwide as they consider implementing similar disclosure regulations to combat corporate tax avoidance. Data Availability: Data in this study are obtained from public sources as identified in the paper. JEL Classifications: H20; H26; M41.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/jata-2023-041

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{junwei2025,
  title        = {{Qualitative Disclosure as a Tax Enforcement Mechanism: Evidence from the U.K. Tax Strategy Disclosure Requirement}},
  author       = {Junwei Xia},
  journal      = {Journal of the American Taxation Association},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/jata-2023-041},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Qualitative Disclosure as a Tax Enforcement Mechanism: Evidence from the U.K. Tax Strategy Disclosure Requirement

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.