arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Politics of neutrality: intermediaries and research use in civics programming

Mariah Kornbluh et al.

Evidence and Policy2026https://doi.org/10.1332/17442648y2026d000000079article
AJG 2
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Pre-emptive gatekeeping contributes to research misuse, as civics scholarship has documented the value of discussing social issues relevant to young people's lives (Clay and Rubin, 2020). Such decision-making has notable implications in relation to critical programming that is reflective of and fully meets the needs of students lived realities (Mirra and Garcia, 2017).

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1332/17442648y2026d000000079

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{mariah2026,
  title        = {{Politics of neutrality: intermediaries and research use in civics programming}},
  author       = {Mariah Kornbluh et al.},
  journal      = {Evidence and Policy},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1332/17442648y2026d000000079},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Politics of neutrality: intermediaries and research use in civics programming

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.