arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Paid to play: football club owner ambitions on promotion to the English premier league and impact on the league

Robert D. Evans

Sport, Business and Management2026https://doi.org/10.1108/sbm-08-2025-0190article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Purpose What can be inferred about the financial and sporting ambitions of football club owners when promoted to the English Premier League (EPL)? Does this effect the competitive balance of the league? Do parachute payments effect sporting outcomes in the EPL? Design/methodology/approach The expected financial gain and additional expenditure on talent for clubs promoted to the EPL are calculated and compared to a hypothetical scenario where clubs spend at least the full gain. The league competitive balance is compared to a hypothetical league without newly promoted clubs. Findings More owners are concerned with retaining expected gains than with avoiding relegation. This did not significantly adversely affect competitive balance in the EPL. Clubs promoted without parachute payments were more successful in avoiding relegation from the EPL. Originality/value Owners of clubs promoted to the EPL are less “win oriented” than their financial gain would allow but more successful if not promoted with a parachute payment.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/sbm-08-2025-0190

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{robert2026,
  title        = {{Paid to play: football club owner ambitions on promotion to the English premier league and impact on the league}},
  author       = {Robert D. Evans},
  journal      = {Sport, Business and Management},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/sbm-08-2025-0190},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Paid to play: football club owner ambitions on promotion to the English premier league and impact on the league

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.