Interrelations between practices and performances of green supply chain management in modern retailing stores

Mohammad Mizenur Rahaman et al.

International Journal of Integrated Supply Management2025https://doi.org/10.1504/ijism.2025.147731article
AJG 1
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

This study focuses on examining the retail industry of Bangladesh and its usage of green supply chain management (GSCM). It will also evaluate the relationship between these practices and different levels of operational performance. Data collection for the study was done by surveying 217 employees of the modern retail sector in Bangladesh. Data analysis was done through structural equation modelling, which explored the relation of operational performance with the various components GSCM, for example, internal environmental management, green purchasing, and green information systems. According to the study, GSCM procedures have a positive and robust correlation with operational performance. For owners and managers to get the most out of their operations, they need to think about green buying, green information systems, and internal environmental management all at once. This study explores the viewpoints of developing countries, contributing to the body of knowledge on green supply chain operations and performance in modern trade.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijism.2025.147731

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{mohammad2025,
  title        = {{Interrelations between practices and performances of green supply chain management in modern retailing stores}},
  author       = {Mohammad Mizenur Rahaman et al.},
  journal      = {International Journal of Integrated Supply Management},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/ijism.2025.147731},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Interrelations between practices and performances of green supply chain management in modern retailing stores

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.