Empowered or Overwhelmed? Wearable Health Technologies and Consumer Well‐Being in the Context of Consumer–Physician Interactions

Brittany B. Beck et al.

Journal of Consumer Affairs2026https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.70040article
AJG 1ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Wearable health technologies (WHTs) increasingly enable continuous, consumer‐driven health monitoring, yet healthcare systems remain organized around episodic, reactive care. This research examines how this misalignment shapes consumer well‐being by integrating consumer and physician perspectives on wearable‐generated data. Study 1 draws on interviews with wearable users and Study 2 involves practicing physicians. Across the two studies, the authors identify four consumer tensions and four parallel physician tensions that emerge in response to continuous health data within episodic care systems. Together, these findings reveal a guidance infrastructure gap, a term coined to describe the absence of interpretive, relational, and system‐level support needed to make continuous data meaningful. The findings show that WHTs influence consumer well‐being not through data access alone, but through the presence or absence of guidance infrastructure that shapes how consumers and providers interpret, navigate, and act on continuous health data.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.70040

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{brittany2026,
  title        = {{Empowered or Overwhelmed? Wearable Health Technologies and Consumer Well‐Being in the Context of Consumer–Physician Interactions}},
  author       = {Brittany B. Beck et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Consumer Affairs},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.70040},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Empowered or Overwhelmed? Wearable Health Technologies and Consumer Well‐Being in the Context of Consumer–Physician Interactions

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.