Strategy Followed Structure: Management Consulting and the Creation of a Market for “Strategy,” 1950–2000

Christopher D. McKenna

Advances in Strategic Management2012https://doi.org/10.1108/s0742-3322(2012)0000029010book-chapter
AJG 2ABDC C
Weight
0.65

What the paper says

Purpose – This chapter traces the creation of a market for strategy by management consulting firms during the second half of the twentieth century in order to demonstrate their impact in shaping debates in the subject and demand for their services by corporate executives.Design/methodology/approach – Using historical analysis, the chapter draws on institutional theory, including institutional isomorphism. It uses both primary and secondary data from the leading consulting firms to describe how consultants shifted from offering advice on organizational structure to corporate strategy and eventually to corporate legitimacy as a result of the changing economic and regulatory environment of the time.Findings/originality/value – This study provides a historical context for the emergence of corporate and competitive strategy as an institutional practice in both the United States and around the world, and provides insights into how important this history can be in understanding the debates among consultants and academics during strategy's emergence as an academic subject and practical application.

30 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/s0742-3322(2012)0000029010

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{christopher2012,
  title        = {{Strategy Followed Structure: Management Consulting and the Creation of a Market for “Strategy,” 1950–2000}},
  author       = {Christopher D. McKenna},
  journal      = {Advances in Strategic Management},
  year         = {2012},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/s0742-3322(2012)0000029010},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Strategy Followed Structure: Management Consulting and the Creation of a Market for “Strategy,” 1950–2000

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.65

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.89 × 0.4 = 0.36
M · momentum0.44 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.