The poetics of knowledge in the Anthropocene: Rancière and the politics of posthuman knowledge

Ben Bowsher

Progress in Human Geography2026https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325251413608article
AJG 3
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This paper responds to debates over the politics of knowledge in the Anthropocene, which often centres on affirmational and negative approaches to posthuman theory. In dialogue with post-foundational geography, the paper outlines a different critical direction that utilises Rancière’s conception of ‘the poetics of knowledge’. It argues that this approach centres the possibility-reconfiguring power of radical politics as an analytical vantage point to critically examine the kinds of spaces, actors, and practices that posthuman theories can support and sustain or contest and disrupt. Doing so offers a means of critical traversal that can reorient posthuman theory to radical political horizons.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325251413608

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{ben2026,
  title        = {{The poetics of knowledge in the Anthropocene: Rancière and the politics of posthuman knowledge}},
  author       = {Ben Bowsher},
  journal      = {Progress in Human Geography},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325251413608},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The poetics of knowledge in the Anthropocene: Rancière and the politics of posthuman knowledge

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.