Mainstreaming vs. normalisation: Towards more conceptual clarity on how mainstream parties legitimise the far right

Anna-Sophie Heinze & Gefjon Off

European Journal of Political Research2026https://doi.org/10.1017/s1475676526100887article
ABDC A
Weight
0.37

Abstract

The far right is becoming increasingly established worldwide and is now in its ‘fourth wave’, characterised by its mainstreaming and normalisation . Although more and more political science research focuses on these processes, we argue that this literature lacks conceptual clarity about what these terms mean, which actors are involved, and what effects these processes have. This article has two aims. First, we describe how mainstreaming and normalisation have been conceptualised and analysed in the existing literature. Building on this, we then introduce a conceptual framework for future empirical research and discuss three research avenues: more precise operationalisations of the mainstream/normal and non-mainstream/abnormal, more refined theories about different political actors, and a broader analytical perspective beyond immigration issues and national-level dynamics.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s1475676526100887

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{anna-sophie2026,
  title        = {{Mainstreaming vs. normalisation: Towards more conceptual clarity on how mainstream parties legitimise the far right}},
  author       = {Anna-Sophie Heinze & Gefjon Off},
  journal      = {European Journal of Political Research},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/s1475676526100887},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Mainstreaming vs. normalisation: Towards more conceptual clarity on how mainstream parties legitimise the far right

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.