Aspects of board diversity and audit fees: evidence from an emerging economy

Aref M. Eissa et al.

Cogent Business & Management2026https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2025.2608432article
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.37

What the paper says

This study examines the impact of board diversity by gender and nationality on audit fees. It also assesses how board diversity moderates the relationship between corporate financial risk and audit fees in the context of recent governance changes in Egypt, as a developing country. Using a sample of 360 firm-year observations of non-financial firms listed on the EGX100 from 2014 to 2019, we conduct univariate and multivariate analyses to examine the impact of board diversity on audit fees after controlling for firm and audit committee characteristics. Our results indicate a significant positive effect of corporate boards’ gender and national diversity on audit fees. We also find that board diversity moderates the relationship between financial risk and audit fees, highlighting its pivotal role in corporate governance. To our knowledge, none of the previous studies examined the moderating role of board diversity concerning the relationship between financial risk and audit fees. Unlike prior studies, we also explore how board diversity influences financial risk implications for audit fees, potentially offering more insights than those derived from audit committee diversity alone.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2025.2608432

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{aref2026,
  title        = {{Aspects of board diversity and audit fees: evidence from an emerging economy}},
  author       = {Aref M. Eissa et al.},
  journal      = {Cogent Business & Management},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2025.2608432},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Aspects of board diversity and audit fees: evidence from an emerging economy

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.