arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

The Odyssey of science: The case of Karl Popper and Adolfo Figueroa

Adolfo Figueroa

Economia2023https://doi.org/10.18800/economia.202302.001article
ABDC C
Weight
0.41

What the paper says

What does the Immanuel kant´s paradox mean for science? Why is the difference between analytic and synthetic sentences-propositions a central puzzle in science, epistemology, analytical philosophy, and philosophy of science? These inquiries entail a profound research on the foundation of philosophy and science. Despite all this necessary endeavor, this brief article focuses on the case Popper-Figueroa with the purpose to highlight the basic philosophical challenges regarding the construction of the bedrock - the substantiality of ontology- or the substratum in the scientific process.

1 citation

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18800/economia.202302.001

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{adolfo2023,
  title        = {{The Odyssey of science: The case of Karl Popper and Adolfo Figueroa}},
  author       = {Adolfo Figueroa},
  journal      = {Economia},
  year         = {2023},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18800/economia.202302.001},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

The Odyssey of science: The case of Karl Popper and Adolfo Figueroa

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.07
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.