A Practical Approach to Understanding: The Possibilities and Limitations of Applied Work in Political Economy

Jayme Lemke & Jonathan Lingenfelter


What the paper says

What can the applied economist do? In order to explore issues playing out in the “real world” of the past or present, the applied social scientist has to make a series of decisions about what they will accept as the facts of the situation. Particularly for research questions in which the beliefs, plans, and motivations of individuals matter – such as institutional analysis – this task requires the development of some degree of intersubjective understanding, orverstehen. For over 50 years, the Bloomington School of Institutional Analysis has been using fieldwork and deep archival history to conduct meaningful institutional analysis that takes interpretation and the quest for understanding seriously. As such, those who wish to take up the call for economists to take an “interpretive turn” can gain a great deal of insight and practical advice from the study of the Bloomington School’s methods and approach.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/s1529-213420170000022005.html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jayme2017,
  title        = {{A Practical Approach to Understanding: The Possibilities and Limitations of Applied Work in Political Economy}},
  author       = {Jayme Lemke & Jonathan Lingenfelter},
  journal      = {Advances in Austrian Economics},
  year         = {2017},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/s1529-213420170000022005.html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

A Practical Approach to Understanding: The Possibilities and Limitations of Applied Work in Political Economy

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.26

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.20 × 0.15 = 0.03
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.