Combining an Odd (vs. an Even) Number of Forecasts with Fat-Tailed Forecast Error

Robert F. Bordley

Decision Analysis2026https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.2026.0567article
AJG 1ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Point estimates plus margins of error communicate statistical information to nonstatisticians. Although descriptive of bell-shaped probability distributions, they can be misleading for uniform or bi-modal distributions. Cooke shows that forecast errors are often described by fat-tailed distributions. Although the fat-tailed Cauchy distribution is bell shaped, the Bayesian combination of multiple Cauchy forecasts can be bell shaped, multimodal, or have a flat maximum. When forecast variation is intermediate, the combined forecast will only be bell shaped when the number of forecasts is odd. In this case, point estimates with margins of error can be informative.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.2026.0567

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{robert2026,
  title        = {{Combining an Odd (vs. an Even) Number of Forecasts with Fat-Tailed Forecast Error}},
  author       = {Robert F. Bordley},
  journal      = {Decision Analysis},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.2026.0567},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Combining an Odd (vs. an Even) Number of Forecasts with Fat-Tailed Forecast Error

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.