Heterogeneous (Mis)Perceptions of Energy Costs: Implications for Measurement and Policy Design

Sébastien Houde & Erica Myers

Journal of Political Economy: Microeconomics2025https://doi.org/10.1086/737244article
ABDC A
Weight
0.37

Abstract

Quantifying heterogeneity in consumers’ misperceptions of product costs is crucial for policy design. We illustrate this point in the energy context and the design of Pigouvian policies. We estimate non-parametric distributions of perceptions of energy costs in the U.S. appliance market using a revealed preference approach. We show that the average degree of misperception is misleading— while the largest share of consumers correctly perceives energy costs, a significant share undervalues them, and smaller shares either significantly overvalues or completely ignores them. We show that setting a tax based on mean misperception deviates substantially from the optimal tax that accounts for heterogeneous misperceptions. While correctly characterizing misperception is crucial for setting optimal Pigouvian taxes for externalities, it is less important for setting optimal standards. We find that standards can largely outperform taxes. Standards’ advantage is they reduce variance in energy operating costs relative to taxes, which internalizes distortionary effects from misperceptions.

1 citation

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/737244

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{sébastien2025,
  title        = {{Heterogeneous (Mis)Perceptions of Energy Costs: Implications for Measurement and Policy Design}},
  author       = {Sébastien Houde & Erica Myers},
  journal      = {Journal of Political Economy: Microeconomics},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/737244},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Heterogeneous (Mis)Perceptions of Energy Costs: Implications for Measurement and Policy Design

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.37

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06
M · momentum0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.