Analysing the drivers of unnecessary caesarean sections in developing countries: a systems approach

Seyed Hossein Hosseini et al.

Health Systems2025https://doi.org/10.1080/20476965.2025.2601100article
AJG 2ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

The World Population Prospects (2022) report by the United Nations highlights a decline in global population growth, underscoring the critical role of healthcare systems in reducing maternal and infant mortality rates. While birth rates vary across high-income and low- and middle-income countries, ensuring safe childbirth remains a fundamental healthcare objective. Despite the known risks associated with unnecessary caesarean sections, their prevalence continues to rise in developing countries. This study examines the underlying factors contributing to this trend, using Iran as a case study. A systems approach is employed, incorporating Causal Loop Diagrams (CLDs) and the Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) to identify and prioritise key influencing factors. The findings suggest that societal and cultural dynamics play a more significant role in the increasing rates of unnecessary caesarean sections than technical medical considerations and individual preferences. Notably, the influence of word-of-mouth and support from reference groups underscores the importance of a community-focused approach in addressing this challenge.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/20476965.2025.2601100

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{seyed2025,
  title        = {{Analysing the drivers of unnecessary caesarean sections in developing countries: a systems approach}},
  author       = {Seyed Hossein Hosseini et al.},
  journal      = {Health Systems},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/20476965.2025.2601100},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Analysing the drivers of unnecessary caesarean sections in developing countries: a systems approach

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.