Team familiarity, task familiarity, and quality competition: Evidence from Japanese sake brewing

Sen Zhang et al.

Journal of Wine Economics2025https://doi.org/10.1017/jwe.2024.36article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Abstract Using longitudinal data on teams and quality competition results, this study examines the impact of team and task familiarity on brewing excellence in the Japanese sake industry from 1956 to 2018. Sake production involves teamwork at every stage, but while some teams work together long term, others experience high turnover. The study highlights two factors: team familiarity, the collective experience of working together, and task familiarity, the individual experience of the task. High familiarity can strengthen team bonds and improve teamwork, but it can also limit the inflow of new knowledge and thus hinder innovation. This study uses data from national quality competitions and brewer lists, and considers the Great East Japan Earthquake of 2011 as an external shock to address endogeneity and estimate the causal relationship between familiarity and competition outcomes. The empirical results show that increases in both team and task familiarity are negatively associated with quality superiority.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/jwe.2024.36

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{sen2025,
  title        = {{Team familiarity, task familiarity, and quality competition: Evidence from Japanese sake brewing}},
  author       = {Sen Zhang et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Wine Economics},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/jwe.2024.36},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Team familiarity, task familiarity, and quality competition: Evidence from Japanese sake brewing

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.