Critical conflict probability: A novel risk measure for quantifying intensity of crash risk at unsignalized intersections
Aninda Bijoy Paul et al.
What the paper says
A significant number of traffic crashes are reported at unsignalized intersections. However, in developing countries, challenges such as underreporting and limited crash data hinder the direct correlation of traffic conflicts with reported crashes for effective safety analysis. To address this, the study introduces Critical Conflict Probability (CCP) as a novel metric to quantify the intensity of conflict risk at unsignalized intersections. Higher CCP values indicate a greater likelihood of crash risk. CCP is derived from Post-Encroachment Time (PET) using the Generalized Extreme Value (GEV)-based extreme value theory (EVT) modeling framework. The CCP values are modeled as a function of traffic flow and driving behavior variables using three approaches: fixed parameters, random intercept, and grouped random parameters Beta regression models. The results revealed grouped random parameters Beta regression model as the best fit, highlighting the importance of accounting for spatial unobserved heterogeneity. As a practical outcome, the study develops a CCP-based intersection prioritization framework to rank and identify critical intersections within a traffic network, enabling traffic planners to improve safety management in data-scarce environments. • This study evaluates drivers' crossing behavior at urban unsignalized intersections in India and estimates conflict probabilities. • Critical Conflict Probabilities (CCP) measure crossing risks using Generalized Extreme Value Theory at unsignalized intersections. • CCP is a better indicator than conflict frequency, identifying risks at low offending and high conflicting traffic volumes. • A grouped random parameters Beta Regression model captures spatial heterogeneity across 13 study sections effectively. • The results revealed that the critical conflict rate, non-critical conflict rate, and traffic composition significantly influence the variation in CCP values.
8 citations
Evidence weight
Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
| F · citation impact | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
| M · momentum | 0.70 × 0.15 = 0.10 |
| V · venue signal | 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 |
| R · text relevance † | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.