LLM-assisted record linkage: A framework for official statistics

Hanan Ather

Statistical Journal of the IAOS2026https://doi.org/10.1177/18747655261422068article
ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

National statistical offices (NSOs) increasingly rely on record linkage to link census data, administrative sources, and survey responses. However, conventional string-similarity methods often struggle with free-text fields. To address these challenges, this paper systematically benchmarks modern open-source large language models (LLMs) against classic string-based comparators for record linkage. Building on these findings, this paper introduces a hybrid approach that retains well-established probabilistic frameworks yet integrates an LLM-based classifier for ambiguous record pairs. A Bayesian update is applied to combine the LLM's output with the prior probability, with the aim of reducing the burden on manual clerical review. The experiments show that selectively deploying open-source LLMs for the most uncertain pairs can significantly reduce manual effort by refining decisions through Bayesian updating. As NSOs must ensure transparency, explainability, and adherence to official statistical standards, this paper systematically addresses these concerns while evaluating the potential of LLMs for record linkage. Practical considerations including secure on-premises deployment, computational cost, human-in-the-loop review, and calibration are discussed to support responsible adoption in official statistics.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/18747655261422068

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{hanan2026,
  title        = {{LLM-assisted record linkage: A framework for official statistics}},
  author       = {Hanan Ather},
  journal      = {Statistical Journal of the IAOS},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/18747655261422068},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

LLM-assisted record linkage: A framework for official statistics

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.