arbiter
JournalsAccount

Do Promarket Reforms Prevent Firms' Environmental Misconduct? The Role of Political Ties and Returnee Directors in Emerging Economies

Adnan Ali et al.

Kyklos2026https://doi.org/10.1111/kykl.70045article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.50

Abstract

Despite recognizing the importance of promarket reforms in enhancing firms' accountability and development in emerging economies like China, their critical role in deterring environmental misconduct has been largely overlooked in the existing literature. To address this gap, this study draws on institutional theory to explore the relationship between promarket reforms and the reduction of environmental misconduct, focusing on the moderating effects of political ties (PT) and returnee directors. Analyzing a sample of 721 Chinese firms, we find a significant negative relationship between promarket reforms and environmental misconduct. Moreover, PT weakens this relationship, whereas returnee directors strengthen it. These findings remain robust across various alternative measures and endogeneity tests, including propensity score matching analysis, Heckman two‐stage model, and a 2‐year lagged analysis. Overall, this study adds value to corporate strategy and environmental management literature by shedding novel insights into the role of promarket reforms in addressing environmental misconduct in emerging economies.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/kykl.70045

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{adnan2026,
  title        = {{Do Promarket Reforms Prevent Firms' Environmental Misconduct? The Role of Political Ties and Returnee Directors in Emerging Economies}},
  author       = {Adnan Ali et al.},
  journal      = {Kyklos},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/kykl.70045},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Do Promarket Reforms Prevent Firms' Environmental Misconduct? The Role of Political Ties and Returnee Directors in Emerging Economies

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.