Product Returns, Customer Segmentation, and Dynamic Pricing in the Online Retail Market

Julia Otte et al.

Journal of Economics & Management Strategy2025https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12627article
AJG 2ABDC A
Weight
0.41

Abstract

Online retailers can adopt generous return policies to entice customers to buy and try new products. In this article, we focus on the learning aspect of product returns and show how an online retailer can utilize returns to segment customers based on their individual valuations of a product. We derive the optimal dynamic pricing strategy, including a potential fee for product returns (restocking fee), which balances the benefits from effective customer segmentation and the costs associated with product returns. Strategic customers, who understand that their return decisions affect future prices, may choose to return the product even when their valuations exceed the initial price. To curb strategic returns, which compromise the effective segmentation of customers, it is optimal for the retailer to reduce the initial price of the product and charge a higher fee for returns. We also identify conditions so that it is optimal for a retailer to overcharge customers for product returns (i.e., the return fee exceeds the actual cost of a return). This allows the retailer to extract surplus from customers who have low product valuations and return the product, and is therefore a form of price discrimination.

2 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12627

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{julia2025,
  title        = {{Product Returns, Customer Segmentation, and Dynamic Pricing in the Online Retail Market}},
  author       = {Julia Otte et al.},
  journal      = {Journal of Economics & Management Strategy},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12627},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Product Returns, Customer Segmentation, and Dynamic Pricing in the Online Retail Market

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.