Publicly Invulnerable, Privately Lonely: How the Unique Individual and Structural Characteristics of Their Organizational Role Contribute to CEO Loneliness

Sarah Wright et al.

Research in Occupational Stress and Well Being2023https://doi.org/10.1108/s1479-355520230000021004book-chapter
AJG 1
Weight
0.73

What the paper says

In this chapter, the authors explore the notion of loneliness in the CEO role. Traditionally, leaders are portrayed as possessing plentiful personal and social resources whereas lonely people are portrayed as socially and personally lacking, and so the notion of being lonely in a leadership position seems counterintuitive. The authors explore the elements of the CEO role and discuss the various ways the position can induce or perpetuate loneliness. The authors review the research on loneliness in relation to the CEO role and lay the foundation for future research in this underdeveloped area. The authors propose that loneliness is likely to develop when CEOs either are new to the leadership role or enact negative individual behaviors and might be felt more acutely during times of poor performance, criticism, and difficult decisions. The authors discuss implications and suggestions for future research.

5 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/s1479-355520230000021004

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{sarah2023,
  title        = {{Publicly Invulnerable, Privately Lonely: How the Unique Individual and Structural Characteristics of Their Organizational Role Contribute to CEO Loneliness}},
  author       = {Sarah Wright et al.},
  journal      = {Research in Occupational Stress and Well Being},
  year         = {2023},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/s1479-355520230000021004},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Publicly Invulnerable, Privately Lonely: How the Unique Individual and Structural Characteristics of Their Organizational Role Contribute to CEO Loneliness

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.73

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.95 × 0.4 = 0.38
M · momentum0.80 × 0.15 = 0.12
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.