Metrics for analyzing regional resilience: a bibliographic and cluster analysis approach

Andrew Crawley et al.

Agricultural and Resource Economics Review2025https://doi.org/10.1017/age.2025.10010article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.41

Abstract

The term resilience has begun to proliferate in regional economic literature over the last decade as more and more authors have sought to connect the term to economic shocks. Resilience as a concept is not new, particularly for ecology and engineering, but its use in regional economic analysis is more recent. Many authors have sought to define and measure the resilience of regions to exogenous shocks, utilizing multifaceted interdisciplinary approaches. This paper uses a bibliometric approach to conduct an in-depth critical review of both the definitions and metrics associated with regional resilience. We found 98 unique studies that were reviewed to collate and analyze methods and indicators used to measure regional economic resilience. Our analysis identified 202 unique metrics (e.g., educational attainment) associated with regional economic resilience that can be aggregated into 15 overarching themes (e.g., demographics), and represented in 3 distinct clusters (e.g., community development).

2 citations

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/age.2025.10010

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{andrew2025,
  title        = {{Metrics for analyzing regional resilience: a bibliographic and cluster analysis approach}},
  author       = {Andrew Crawley et al.},
  journal      = {Agricultural and Resource Economics Review},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/age.2025.10010},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Metrics for analyzing regional resilience: a bibliographic and cluster analysis approach

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.41

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.25 × 0.4 = 0.10
M · momentum0.55 × 0.15 = 0.08
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.