arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Ageïsme doorbreken: Hoe professionals het verschil kunnen maken

Ingrid G. Boelhouwer et al.

Gedrag en Organisatie2026https://doi.org/10.5117/go2026.1.003.boelarticle
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Counteracting ageism: How professionals can make a difference In recent years, the proportion of employed individuals aged 55 and over has continued to rise, and labour experts are increasingly working with older clients. Ageism (stereotyping, prejudices, and discrimination based on age) deprives individuals of opportunities and possibilities. Ageism may also play a role in the services of labour experts. This study comprises a literature review, an interactive questionnaire among labour experts, and focus groups with these professionals. The findings reveal that labour experts hold biases and stereotypes about older individuals. Furthermore, labour experts aged 50 or younger and those who wish to retire earlier tend to stereotype older individuals more. The questionnaire remains open as a tool for learning and reflection. A reframing approach was developed in co-creation with the labour experts to address and counteract ageism in their professional practice.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5117/go2026.1.003.boel

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{ingrid2026,
  title        = {{Ageïsme doorbreken: Hoe professionals het verschil kunnen maken}},
  author       = {Ingrid G. Boelhouwer et al.},
  journal      = {Gedrag en Organisatie},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5117/go2026.1.003.boel},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Ageïsme doorbreken: Hoe professionals het verschil kunnen maken

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.