arbiter
JournalsAccount

A research on the regulatory human resource allocation efficiency under the random examination system

Jian Chu

China Journal of Accounting Studies2025https://doi.org/10.1080/21697213.2025.2469696article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.50

Abstract

The traditional view is that the more regulatory staff is, the stronger regulatory enforcement is, and the better regulatory effect is. However, from the perspective of team coordination, the more regulatory staff is, the higher the regulatory team coordination cost is, and the worse regulatory effect is. Based on the CSRC’s random examination system, it is found that under this system, corporate financial misreporting decreases firstly and then increases with the increase of on-site examiners. Mechanism tests indicate that this result is more significant when the regulatory team coordination cost is higher, such as the time team members having worked together is shorter, team diversity is higher, or team members are busier. It is also found that auditors nonlinearly adjust their audit fees according to the change of regulatory pressure. The above results suggest that the regulatory team coordination cost does influence the regulatory human resource allocation efficiency.

Open via your library →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/21697213.2025.2469696

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jian2025,
  title        = {{A research on the regulatory human resource allocation efficiency under the random examination system}},
  author       = {Jian Chu},
  journal      = {China Journal of Accounting Studies},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/21697213.2025.2469696},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

A research on the regulatory human resource allocation efficiency under the random examination system

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.