Efficient multiple‐robust estimation for nonresponse data under informative sampling

Kosuke Morikawa et al.

Scandinavian Journal of Statistics2026https://doi.org/10.1111/sjos.70043article
AJG 3
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Nonresponse in probability sampling presents a long‐standing challenge in survey sampling, often necessitating simultaneous adjustments to address sampling and selection biases. We develop a statistical framework that explicitly models sampling weights as random variables and establish the semiparametric efficiency bound for the parameter of interest under nonresponse. This study investigates strategies for eliminating bias and effectively utilizing available information, extending beyond nonresponse issues to data integration with external summary statistics. The proposed estimators are characterized by their efficiency and double robustness. However, realizing full efficiency hinges on the accurate specification of underlying models. To enhance robustness against potential model misspecification, we expand double robustness to multiple robustness through a novel two‐step empirical likelihood approach. A numerical study evaluates the finite‐sample performance of our methods. Additionally, we apply these methods to a dataset from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, effectively integrating summary statistics from the National Health Interview Survey.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/sjos.70043

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{kosuke2026,
  title        = {{Efficient multiple‐robust estimation for nonresponse data under informative sampling}},
  author       = {Kosuke Morikawa et al.},
  journal      = {Scandinavian Journal of Statistics},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/sjos.70043},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Efficient multiple‐robust estimation for nonresponse data under informative sampling

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.