arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Coordinating patient care across multiple healthcare professionals: Essential factors and challenges

Delphine Wannenmacher et al.

Health Services Management Research2025https://doi.org/10.1177/09514848251374968article
AJG 1ABDC C
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Care coordination has been the subject of several laws on coordinated care pathways and healthcare system modernization to make care paths more fluid, simplify, and consolidate support systems for coordinating complex pathways. However, patients and professionals continue to experience deteriorating systems and slow changes. In this context, our research studies the effective modalities of multi-professional coordination of patient care pathways in France. To this end, we conducted 51 interviews with professionals, structures, patients, and caregivers. To analyze the data, we drew on the literature to distinguish between organizational, functional, and personalized coordination regarding intra- and inter-organizational dimensions. The results of our study provide a better understanding of the contributions and limitations of the new coordination systems, as well as the challenges still to be met.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/09514848251374968

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{delphine2025,
  title        = {{Coordinating patient care across multiple healthcare professionals: Essential factors and challenges}},
  author       = {Delphine Wannenmacher et al.},
  journal      = {Health Services Management Research},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/09514848251374968},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Coordinating patient care across multiple healthcare professionals: Essential factors and challenges

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.