Proactive local government: How London borough councils build capacity to respond to asylum

Melissa Weihmayer

Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space2026https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544261424640article
AJG 3
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

London’s borough councils are adapting to the increase in asylum-seekers since 2020. I explore their shift from reactive to more strategic and proactive responses, observed during a series of ‘design lab’ workshops between January and June 2023 in the Greater London Authority’s Asylum Welcome programme. Driven by a need to be better prepared to support people seeking asylum, I examine how councils built capacity despite limited funding and no clear role within asylum policy. I find that capacity-building is a multi-stage process that extends beyond new skills and resources. It requires resolving dilemmas to clarify roles and goals, and building confidence through knowledge and partnerships, before developing skills for implementation. Ultimately, I show that such capacity-building processes reveal how local government does political work through its practice: they affirm the local state’s duty of care to people seeking asylum. Though they struggle to change asylum policy without central government reforms, this research nonetheless recasts local governments as well-equipped to adapt to new and uncertain challenges.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544261424640

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{melissa2026,
  title        = {{Proactive local government: How London borough councils build capacity to respond to asylum}},
  author       = {Melissa Weihmayer},
  journal      = {Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544261424640},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Proactive local government: How London borough councils build capacity to respond to asylum

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.