arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Do Public Works Programs Have Sustained Impacts? A Review of Experimental Studies from LMICs

Aanchal Bagga et al.

World Bank Research Observer2024https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkae011review
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.30

What the paper says

Abstract Many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have introduced public works programs that offer temporary cash-for-work opportunities to poor individuals. We review experimental evidence on the impacts of public works programs on participants over the short and medium run, providing new insights on whether they have sustained impacts. Our findings show that public works mainly increase employment and earnings during the program. Short-term positive effects tend to fade in the medium run, except in a few cases in which large impacts on savings or investments in self-employment activities are also observed. We find evidence of improvements in psychological well-being and women's empowerment in some cases, but not systematically, and with limitations in measurement. In some contexts, public works programs also improve market wages, affecting both participants and non-participants. We conclude by outlining directions for future research.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkae011

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{aanchal2024,
  title        = {{Do Public Works Programs Have Sustained Impacts? A Review of Experimental Studies from LMICs}},
  author       = {Aanchal Bagga et al.},
  journal      = {World Bank Research Observer},
  year         = {2024},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkae011},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Do Public Works Programs Have Sustained Impacts? A Review of Experimental Studies from LMICs

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.30

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.00 × 0.4 = 0.00
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.