Reactions to policy action: socio-political conditions of backlash to climate change policy

James Patterson et al.

Policy Science2025https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-025-09578-5article
AJG 1ABDC B
Weight
0.48

What the paper says

Public policymaking on issues requiring ambitious yet socially and economically costly action can face backlash from target groups and wider audiences, threatening policy adoption and durability. As an abrupt negative reaction to policy action, backlash is challenging to study and requires distinctive analytical approaches. This is especially pressing for climate change mitigation policy, which faces growing yet dispersed empirical experiences of backlash. We develop a framework to study the socio-political conditions (economic, cultural, practical) under which backlash to climate policy occurs to enable comparative empirical analysis. We posit that backlash arises from significant incongruence between policy action and its socio-political context across one or more of these dimensions. We illustrate this approach using three cases of backlash to carbon pricing policy in Canada, France, and Mexico, revealing different ways in which incongruence can arise. Our analysis highlights the need for configurational explanations and a policy-in-context perspective when studying contentious reactions to policy action.

5 citations

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-025-09578-5

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{james2025,
  title        = {{Reactions to policy action: socio-political conditions of backlash to climate change policy}},
  author       = {James Patterson et al.},
  journal      = {Policy Science},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-025-09578-5},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Reactions to policy action: socio-political conditions of backlash to climate change policy

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.48

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.41 × 0.4 = 0.16
M · momentum0.63 × 0.15 = 0.09
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.