Embodied Collaborative Developmental Action Inquiry to Become More Reflexive Research-Practitioners in Action

Jacqueline van Paassen & Bruno Pešec

Action Research2025https://doi.org/10.1177/14767503251375861article
AJG 1
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

This paper outlines several cycles of first- and second-person inquiry that explore how two doctoral candidates developed reflexive capacity-in-action. We illustrate the essential developmental shifts we experienced while facilitating research co-inquiry groups, offering a joint reflection through the theoretical lens of shifting and loosening habitual patterns. We explore how habitus and implicit relational patterns serve as blueprints for how we engage with and co-construct our social and organisational realities. Building on Collaborative Developmental Action Inquiry practices, we exemplify how research-practitioners can become aware of personal and cultural habituations that shape and constrain what we can hold in our awareness at any given moment. We present several cycles of reflection both in, and on action, beginning with our experiences as initiators of an Action Inquiry Group during our doctoral programme and the challenges we faced in extending this quality of inquiry beyond the research paradigm. Ultimately, we found that as action researchers, the specific practices described in this paper equipped us to better uphold the qualities of mutuality, integrity, and sustainability in collaborative projects within conventional contexts.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/14767503251375861

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{jacqueline2025,
  title        = {{Embodied Collaborative Developmental Action Inquiry to Become More Reflexive Research-Practitioners in Action}},
  author       = {Jacqueline van Paassen & Bruno Pešec},
  journal      = {Action Research},
  year         = {2025},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/14767503251375861},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Embodied Collaborative Developmental Action Inquiry to Become More Reflexive Research-Practitioners in Action

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.


Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.