arbiter
JournalsPricingAccount

Negotiating Peace with Pro-Government Militias?: Human Rights Violations, International Pressure, and the Case of the Self-Defense Forces of Colombia (AUC)

Andrew Thomson

Negotiation Journal2026https://doi.org/10.1162/ngtn.a.55article
AJG 2ABDC B
Weight
0.50

What the paper says

Abstract This article theorizes when and why governments negotiate peace with pro-government militias (PGMs) or “pro-state” paramilitary groups. I argue that negotiations with PGMs are more likely to occur when PGM activities become costly and when domestic and international pressure to account for PGM violence mounts on both sides. While governments support (even if tacitly) PGMs for short-term advantages in counterinsurgency, PGMs often pursue their own agendas and can end up harming state interests, resulting in a shift from support to curtailing PGM activity. I build this argument drawing on examples from around the world and providing initial evidence from the Colombian government’s negotiated agreements with the Autodefensas Unidas de Colombia (AUC) in Santa Fe de Ralito in 2003–2005.

Open paper page →

Cite this paper

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/ngtn.a.55

Or copy a formatted citation

@article{andrew2026,
  title        = {{Negotiating Peace with Pro-Government Militias?: Human Rights Violations, International Pressure, and the Case of the Self-Defense Forces of Colombia (AUC)}},
  author       = {Andrew Thomson},
  journal      = {Negotiation Journal},
  year         = {2026},
  doi          = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/ngtn.a.55},
}

Paste directly into BibTeX, Zotero, or your reference manager.

Flag this paper

Negotiating Peace with Pro-Government Militias?: Human Rights Violations, International Pressure, and the Case of the Self-Defense Forces of Colombia (AUC)

Flags are reviewed by the Arbiter methodology team within 5 business days.

Evidence weight

0.50

Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40

F · citation impact0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20
M · momentum0.50 × 0.15 = 0.07
V · venue signal0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03
R · text relevance †0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20

† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.