Digital transformation of the AEC industry: a review of BIM implementation toolkits from leading countries
Adhban Farea et al.
What the paper says
Purpose This study critically reviews building information modelling (BIM) implementation toolkits from countries recognised as leaders in BIM adoption, with the intention of identifying lessons that can inform the creation of more effective and comprehensive digital strategy resources. The objective is to identify best practices, recurring gaps, and the evolving role of BIM guides, standards and technical reports in facilitating digital transformation across the construction sector. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative comparative analysis was conducted on 24 BIM implementation toolkits from leading countries, assessing each against 16 key dimensions: role-specific guidance, ISO 19650 alignment, project stages, template availability, asset management, certification alignment, BIM model quality control, classification of BIM elements, modelling practices and levels of detail (LOD/LOI), CDE and data security, coordination workflows, compliance checking and interoperability, technology integration (AI, IoT, Digital Twins), sustainability integration, project type coverage and dynamic navigation. Only BIM implementation-focused guidance, standards and technical reports written in English language, issued by government or recognised industry institutions and published within 2013–2024 were included. Findings The analysis found that 67% of toolkits are guides rather than standards or technical reports, reflecting the global need for flexible and adaptable resources that cater to organisations at varying stages of BIM implementation. More recent toolkits demonstrate clearer provisions for CDE and data security, coordination, classification and LOD/LOI, whereas earlier but influential guides remain stronger in their treatment of project stages and template provision. Consistent gaps persist in technology integration, sustainability, automated compliance/interoperability checking, clear BIM certification pathways and dynamic web-navigable formats. Project type coverage is still building-heavy, with infrastructure addressed unevenly unless dedicated infra toolkits exist. Research limitations/implications The study examines only English-language BIM implementation toolkits that emerged between 2013 and 2024. Future research needs to study various languages, multiple publication years and editions as well as collecting data from practitioners actively working with these toolkits. Originality/value The research presents a complete worldwide assessment that examines 24 BIM implementation toolkits through 16 essential criteria from 2013 to 2024. It provides a critical comparative matrix and proposes a harmonised vision for future national BIM toolkits, incorporating advanced digital integration, compliance assurance and lifecycle usability.
1 citation
Evidence weight
Balanced mode · F 0.40 / M 0.15 / V 0.05 / R 0.40
| F · citation impact | 0.16 × 0.4 = 0.06 |
| M · momentum | 0.53 × 0.15 = 0.08 |
| V · venue signal | 0.50 × 0.05 = 0.03 |
| R · text relevance † | 0.50 × 0.4 = 0.20 |
† Text relevance is estimated at 0.50 on the detail page — for your query’s actual relevance score, open this paper from a search result.